archiving of SOWACS
proudly sponsored by

this could be your logo - >

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Onset Hobo dataloggers; Watermark retrofit



NOTE:  To get off this list, send email to majordomo@aqua.ccwr.ac.za
with the body of the message containing the line:
unsubscribe sowacs

John,

Thanks for the update on what Onset Corp. proposes to offer 
concerning switched excitation.  I am disappointed that Onset has 
chosen not to offer this option for the Hobo H8 4E Outdoor/Industrial 
Logger, or even for the Hobo H8 indoor logger.  I believe that this may 
be a missed opportunity to provide a ready unit directly from the 
manufacturer that could be used with any number of resistance 
based soil water sensors.

I disagree that the soil sensor technology is the hard part.  But even 
so, I do not see where this obviates the potential or need to produce 
inexpensive, field-ready logger units that can be interfaced by the 
user with his/her soil water sensors.

Thanks for the update.

Rick Allen

> 
> Hello Rick,
> 
> You are correct that Onset can provide a 4-channel data logger for use 
> with most analog output sensors. However, we have not been directly 
> marketing our standard 4-channel logger for soil moisture logging 
> because we recognise that the data logger is the low-tech system 
> element in that application. The "hard part" of soil water sensing is 
> understanding and properly applying the sensor technology. There 
> are companies, and individuals such as yourself, that are better 
> qualified for that role than Onset, and we have chosen to support 
> them with what we do best by offering OEM versions 
> of our data logger(s).
> 
> The sensor polarization problem you descibe has been solved in the 
> -IP version of our 4-channel OEM logger. The -IP logger is one of two 
> OEM loggers available from Onset. Those loggers are not in end 
> user configurations, and do require some added value by the purchaser. 
> They are provided to qualified OEM's as unprogrammed, or board level 
> parts, for integration into their proprietary systems. For example, 
> the -IP version is uniquely programmed by the OEM with channel 
> switching and delay timing specific to their sensor. The -IP is also a 
> board level product that requires additional packaging for use outdoors.
> 
> We do not recommend that an end user purchase our standard data 
> loggers directly for use with most common low cost soil moisture 
> sensors because each sensor type has specific interface considerations. 
> We do recommend that end users contact their preferred supplier of 
> low cost soil moisture monitoring systems for additional information 
> on the data loggers they have available.
> 
> Regards, John Johnston
> Onset Computer Corporation
> P.O. Box 3450
> Pocasset, MA 02559-3450
> Web: www.onsetcomp.com
> (800) 564-4377
> (508) 759-9500 Ext 158
> (508) 759-9100 FAX
> >
> >
> >John Johnston, 
> >
> >Your recent Email indicated that the tipping bucket is the only soil-
> >water related application thus far from Onset Corp.  What about the 
> >company's retrofit of the Hobo datalogger to facilitate the 
> >measurement of four WaterMark sensors?  My understanding was 
> >that all engineering had been worked out on this and that it was 
> >merely a matter of production.  The product would be a datalogger for 
> >around $150 that is weather proof and that can measure four WM or 
> >other resistance-based soil sensors.  Can you bring us up to speed 
> >on the status?
> >
> >As I've indicated to Onset in the past, if one can produce a low-cost 
> >data logger (in say the $100 range)  that can record a near-
> >continuous record of soil water content or potential, one may see 
> >these planted by the tens of thousands as farmers utilize them to 
> >monitor how well they have been managing irrigation or other land 
> >applications.  The system must be cheap enough that it can be 
> >cultivated out by a 15 year high school kid on a tractor, but then 
> >replaced by the kid's father, because the cost is relatively low as 
> >compared to the benefit.
> >
> >In this type of situation, the absolute accuracy of the reading is of 
> >much less importance than is the relative change in recorded signal 
> >over time.  This is what a farmer will evaluate at the close of an 
> >irrigation season.  He can look back over the record of soil water 
> >content or potential (relative readings) and evaluate trends and 
> >changes over time as they are impacted by how he has managed the 
> >system.  He'll use this information to improve his management the 
> >following season.
> >
> >It would be even better to have a display on the logger that can 
> >provide a graph of the last four weeks or so of measurements at a 
> >glance, for example like that used on the AM400 system being 
> >produced by M.K. Hansen Company of East Wenatchee, WA. (
> >mikeh@nwi.net ,2216 Fancher Blvd. East, Wenatchee, Wa 98802
> >1-509-884-1396,  fax 2218).  Hansen's system can read up to six 
> >Watermark probes at a time (using AC excitation) along with soil 
> >temperature and sells for approximately $250 in bulk (I believe), 
> >which isn't a bad price.  The graphical display is invaluable for 
> >allowing a farmer to quickly review the recent trends in soil water 
> >change and the need for any on the spot actions.  The logger can 
> >retain a year's worth of data in memory and downloads to a notebook 
> >computer.
> >
> >Regarding the less expensive Hobo datalogger, I can send a three 
> >page writeup on how to connect the Onset Hobo datalogger to 
> >WaterMark or other resistance based sensors to anyone interested.  
> >Send a request to RALLEN@Kimberly.uidaho.edu  .  The Hobo 
> >logger uses DC excitation in its reads which can cause some 
> >electrolysis effect (i.e., micro gas bubbles) at the electrodes.  This 
> >can bias the electrical conductance and therefore the resistance 
> >reading.  However, my understanding is that the retrofit that has been 
> >reengineered by Onset for soil-water applications will shorten the 
> >time of excitation on each of the four channels so that the magnitude 
> >of the electrolysis effect may become insignificant.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >Rick Allen
> >Water Resources Engineer
> >Univ. Idaho
> >
> >> John Johnston writes
> >> 
> >> Hello Again SOWACS
> >> 
> >> I was formerly with ESI in San Diego, CA, and occasionally gave inputs
> >on
> >> the use of TDR in soil moisture applications. About 20 months ago I
> >joined
> >> Onset in Pocasset, MA, but until recently haven't had anything useful to
> >> present to SOWACS. Early this year Onset offered its first product
> >related
> >> to soil water in the form of a fully integrated tipping bucket rainfall
> >> logger. http://www.onsetcomp.com Please take a look at it, and if you
> >have
> >> comments let us know on
> >> our site registration page under "Request a Catalog". I had our internet
> >> site administrator add a source code selection called SOWACS under the
> >> links and newsgroups pulldown, so that you could leave your "tracks"..
> >> 
> >> Although I haven't been in a position to make a useful contribution, I
> >> have continued to monitor SOWACS as a learning experience. Thanks again
> >to
> >> Bruce and everyone for continuing my education on this continually
> >> challenging instrument application.
> >> 
> >> John Johnston
> >> Onset
> >> Web: www.onsetcomp.com
> >> (800) 564-4377
> >> (508) 759-9500 Ext 158
> >> (508) 759-9100 FAX
> >> 
> 
> 
> 
>