archiving of SOWACS
proudly sponsored by

this could be your logo - >

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thermal Conductivity Sensors



NOTE:  To get off this list, send email to majordomo@aqua.ccwr.ac.za
with the body of the message containing the line:
unsubscribe sowacs

Dear Saskatoon,

The paper published by A.R.G. Lang, 1967 (Osmotic coefficients and water 
potentials of sodium chloride solutions from 0 to 40 oC, Aust. J. Chem., 
20:2017-2023) have been used as a standard to calibrate different soil 
water potential instruments (such as soil and plant 
hygrometers/psychrometers, filter paper technique, etc.). In the paper 
you'll find the water potential (-214.4 to -10350 J kg -1) vs. molality of 
NaCl solution at different temperatures (0 to 40 oC). Hope it helps.

S. Irmak


At 09:59 AM 1/25/01 +0000, you wrote:
Bruce:
>
>I am going to be calibrating some of the Campbell Scientific 229 sensors.
>  I am going to use pressure from 0-400 kPa but I would like to calibrate
>at a higher kPa.  I read somewhere that letting the sensors "hang" in a
>jar containing a solution of potassium sulfate at 20 degrees Celcius will
>give an equivalent total suction of 4120 kPa.  Do you know of a solution
>(and temperature) that might give an equivalent total suction between 400
>and 4120 kPa?  I would really appreciate the input.
>
></smaller></fontfamily>
>
><fontfamily><param>Times New Roman</param><smaller>Elizabeth A. Garven
>
></smaller></fontfamily>
>
><fontfamily><param>Times New Roman</param><smaller>125B-105th Street
>East
>
>Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
>
>CANADA
>
>Phone: (306) 955-3218
>
><<mailto:eag-okc@attcanada.ca>eag-okc@attcanada.ca
>
></smaller></fontfamily>




Suat Irmak
Agric. & Bio. Eng. Dept.
University of Florida, Rogers Hall
P.O. Box 110570, Gainesville, FL 32611-0570
E-mail: aysu@grove.ufl.edu
WWW: http://www.agen.ufl.edu/~isuat