archiving of SOWACS
proudly sponsored by

this could be your logo - >

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: retention curves or characteristic curves? One vote for CHARACTERISTIC



NOTE:  To get off this list, send email to majordomo@aqua.ccwr.ac.za
with the body of the message containing the line:
unsubscribe sowacs

There are about 12 ways to name the relationship. I vote for

  "soil water characteristic curve"

However, a rose by any other name would smell as sweat.

Glenn Brown
Associate Professor
Biosystems Engineering
Oklahoma State University
Stillwater, OK  74078
(405) 744-8425
gbrown@okstate.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sowacs@aqua.ccwr.ac.za <owner-sowacs@aqua.ccwr.ac.za>
To: gbrown@ceat.okstate.edu <gbrown@ceat.okstate.edu>
Date: Friday, February 09, 2001 10:34 PM
Subject: retention curves or characteristic curves?


>I have a doubt on how to name the water content/degree of saturation versus
>suction relationship:
>
>"water/moisture retention curve"
>
>or
>
>"soil water characteristic curve"?
>
>..... yes, I know this is not a fundamental problem, but I am interested in
>your opinion anyway.
>
>
>Alessandro Tarantino
>
>
>
>P.S. I am not sure to be still in the unsaturated list. How can I check it?
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------
>Dr Alessandro TARANTINO
>Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Strutturale
>Universitý degli Studi di Trento
>Via Mesiano, 77
>38050 Trento, Italy
>Phone:  ++39-0461-882519
>        ++39-0461-882551 (laboratory)
>Fax:    ++39-0461-882599
>E-mail: tarantin@ing.unitn.it
>Web: http://www.ing.unitn.it/~labgtec/
>
>
>
>
>