|
archiving of SOWACS proudly sponsored by |
![]() |
>Hi all, > >> We did not do any systematic analysis or experiments but in one study we <SNIP> >> impenetrable profile. They also liked to grow along interfaces. >> >> As my Agrometeorology used to say: "the closer you get to what you want to >> measure, the more you disturb whats you want to measure" ... (or words to >> that effect - apologies). > >My experience is limited, but I would like to make some comment based >on that limited experience. >1. Horizontally buried sensors (I presently use a 2 meter lngth of >sensor to prevent water distribution errors) appear to be >less overgrown by roots than vertically buried sensors. Is this due >to water infilration down the sides of the vertical tube? I was referring to horizontally INSERTED point probes, rather than the long length probes I think you are referring to. (How's the work coming on them, by the way Johan?) >> >> The importance of site disturbance is often over-looked, or else it is >> impractical to take measures sufficient to prevent it completely. >> >2. While it appears to be a physical law that nothing can be measured >without disturbing it, it only takes two irrigation cycles for >everything to appear normal. Having said that, there is a slow small >movement of the base line over months, probably due to further >compaction. As long as a sensor is required only as a relative measure, this will be of no consequence. If this drift is real, then fine and well - and it indicates that the sensor takes account of the bulk density - and changes due to settling/compaction. But if the drift is an artefact of the sensor, then it cannot be used for absolute measures. How would one differentiate? Perhaps use a sand test bed that will not settle or compact? > >Regards > >Johan Smit >smit.js@pixie.co.za >P.O.Box 9551 George 6530 RSA >Tel +2744,8745533 > > -- Bruce Metelerkamp _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/brooz@nodamnedspam.pobox.com http://pobox.com/~brooz _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ ... remove the "nodamned.." bit .... :>