archiving of SOWACS
proudly sponsored by


this could be
your logo - >

[Prev][Next][Index]

Re: Measuring Evapotranspiration



20 Nov. 1996

Dear Sowacs and Dean Reynolds:

In the strictest sense, ET can only be MEASEURED one way -- by eddy
correlation.  Other common ET measurements -- lysimeters, water, or energy
balance -- must be considered indirect.  So neutron probes and TDR are
tools useful in measuring a volume water balance, but they can't measure
ET!  A weather station doesn't measure ET either!  I'm not a STRONG fan of
eddy correlation either, but theoretically the mean product of short-time
perturbations in vertical winds and absolute humidity defines the ET rate
(when multiplied times the mean air density).  And that's not saying that
measuring ET with eddy correlation is perfect nor is it even practical!  A
weighing lysimeter can "directly measure" ET for time periods when no rain
or irrigation occurs (and assuming percolation is measured).  A weighing
lysimeter measures the mass of the soil water (along with the soil and
plant mass); hence, any temporal changes in mass are attributed to water
uptake and transpiration by plants or evaporation from the soil (or plant)
surface.  Of course, the small mass accumulation from photosynthesis also
acts against the negative mass change caused by ET.  [This is a good
exercise for a serious student to determine the weighing error in ET
measured by a weighing lysimeter cased by photosynthesis.]

Neutron scattering (NS) can be useful in making precise water balance
determinations.  BUT I have to throw out several precautions:

	1.  calibration is mandatory and precise methods are critical
	2.  DEEP (I repeat deep) measurements are required (at least 1 m  or more
beyond the crop root zone (this may mean going to 2-3 m depths in most cases)
	3.  deep percolation losses from the profile MUST be avoided (use in high
water table areas or where upward flow occurs renders the NS method useless
for ET)
	4.  very accurate water accounting (rain, irrigation) at that spot and for
the surrounding area must be accomplished (may involve measuring runoff,
etc.).

A few comparisons of NS-water balance ET and lysimeter ET have been made.
Jim Wright at ARS-Kimberly, ID, Steve Evett at ARS-Bushland, TX, and C.H.M.
van Bavel (formerly at ARS-Phioenix, AZ) and others have published brief
papers on this topic.  I'm sure others may have published papers of which
I'm not aware at this moment.  Generally, if the above conditions are met
the agreement is satisfactory (within +- 0.1-0.2 mm/d for a 3-5 day period).

I've been impressed by some of the diurnal traces from the capacitance
gauges that appear to offer useful precision in determining daily (with
good precision) ET amounts.  But I'm not aware of any "rigorous" testing
that would validate or "prove" that point.  Also, then the "absolute"
calibration of the probe becomes somewhat more critical.

Terry Howell, Ph.D., P.E.
USDA-ARS
Bushland, Texas USA
tahowell@ag.gov



At 11:22 AM 11/20/96 PST, you wrote:
>
>I recently attended a class where the statement was made that neutron
probes can not be used to measure ET.  If this is true I would assume the
person would say the same about TDR.  
>
>I have become certified to use a neutron probe for two reasons, 1) We have
one and 2) I thought I might be able to get some studies going to update
crop ET numbers.
>
>I realize that it would be better to use lysimeters, but.. they are
expensive and not readily available and I would guess expensive.  It would
be great if I could talk DWR into installing its own but not in my lifetime.  
>
>Someone must have done comparison studies with probes of various types and
lysimeters.  
>
>
>I ask this group to give your opinions on this subject.  I am asking the
question regarding measurement of real-time ET not as an irrigation
scheduling tool.
>
>

*********************************************************************
* Terry A. Howell, Ph.D., P.E.                       (806) 356-5746 *
* USDA-ARS                                     (806) 356-5750 (Fax) *
* P.O. Drawer 10                           tahowell@ag.gov (E-mail) *
* Bushland, TX  79012      http://www.net.usda.gov/cprl/ (Internet) *
*                                                                   *
* 1/2 mi. West I-40 South Access Rd. (shipping)                     *
*********************************************************************