archiving of SOWACS
proudly sponsored by


this could be
your logo - >

[Prev][Next][Index]

Re: Eddy correlation and Bowen ratio



21 Nov. 1996

Dear Mike and SOWACS:

I don't think either eddy correlation or Bowen ratio measurements can
"unequivocally" replace lysimeters (not YET anyway).  

In principle, water vapor flux can be measured via eddy correlation.  But
instrumentation problems still linger, and as you noted eddy correlation
requires high maintenance.  I haven't read your EC papers yet, but typical
energy balance closures are seldom less than +-10 % of available incoming
energy (Rn - G) [the best weighing lysimeters may be that far off too].
Bowen ratio is less maintenance intensive, but requires dependence on Rn
and the assumptions about Kh/Kv.  Anyone that assumes a BR-energy balance
measurement is better than +-10 % needs to study net radiometers a little
longer!  We've discovered calibration errors of 5-8 % even in Eppley
pyranometers and net radiometers may be considerably worse.  Folks that
seem the most satisfied with eddy correlation pick THE net radiometer from
a group of net radiometers that closes the energy balance the most
consistently!

You are right that EC (eddy correlation) and BR (Bowen ratio- energy
balance) reflect much larger areas (by the footprint analyses).  I omitted
this point but it should be critical to recognize this fact.

The bottom line is that nothing (EC, BR, lysimeters, soil water balance,
etc.) is without problems.

Good to hear from you.  Your points were good!

Dean Reynold's original post implied if you had a neutron meter you should
be able to measure ET, and that's not the case with anything (EC, BR, TDR,
.....) without doing considerable behind the scenes work and making a host
of ancillary measurements!  

One subtle point is that eddy correlation measures ET (if you measure the
covariance of water vapor), but the Bowen ratio INFERS ET (does not measure
ET; by an energy balance assuming Kh=Kv).  As you mentioned, using eddy
correlation to measure heat flux and then measuring Rn and G, again INFERS
ET (by an energy balance).

Terry Howell



*********************************************************************
* Terry A. Howell, Ph.D., P.E.                       (806) 356-5746 *
* USDA-ARS                                     (806) 356-5750 (Fax) *
* P.O. Drawer 10                           tahowell@ag.gov (E-mail) *
* Bushland, TX  79012      http://www.net.usda.gov/cprl/ (Internet) *
*                                                                   *
* 1/2 mi. West I-40 South Access Rd. (shipping)                     *
*********************************************************************